Re: Traditional palette vs. modern 585 by Steve Sauer on 05/27/01 at 11:32 PM
Re: Traditional palette vs. modern

In Reply to: Re: Traditional palette vs. modern posted by Ed on 05/26/01 at 10:03 PM:

Ok.. You are just being ridiculous. First, you consistently proclaim the authority of the ASTM ratings and infer that I am ignorant because I haven't been referring to them. Then, when I show them to be fallible, you tell me not to worship them!

Your beloved Naphol faded in a matter of weeks in normal lighting. It was rated ASTM II. I'd rather use buckets of Vermilion for 50 years of fine art than a single tube of your ASTM-rated Naphol.

As for the rest of your contradictions and convenient manipulations, I really don't have the time.


Follow Ups:

Re: Traditional palette vs. modern Ed   Posted at: 05/28/01 (0)

Post a Followup 545,548,555,560,565,566,573,582,583,585"> Steve Sauer"> s_s.comRe: Traditional palette vs. modern_05/27/01 at 11:32 PM"> "Re: Traditional palette vs. modern"
: Ok.. You are just being ridiculous. First, you consistently proclaim the authority of the ASTM ratings and infer that I am ignorant because I haven't been referring to them. Then, when I show them to be fallible, you tell me not to worship them! : Your beloved Naphol faded in a matter of weeks in normal lighting. It was rated ASTM II. I'd rather use buckets of Vermilion for 50 years of fine art than a single tube of your ASTM-rated Naphol. : As for the rest of your contradictions and convenient manipulations, I really don't have the time.

 
A. A. Art. This Site designed and maintained by Alexei Antonov
Translation from Russian Copyright (c) 1999 Vladimir Pavlov.
Copyright (c) 1999 Alexei Antonov. All rights reserved.